Open standards. Working systems.
The institutional capability to
keep them honest.
I work where open data standards meet the public spending,
public investment, and public ownership records they describe.
Mapping fields, wiring publication and validation, and building
the institutional muscle to keep the data current and trustworthy
long after the launch event is over.
Deepest in OC4IDS.
Present across OCDS, EITI,
BODS, and adjacent standards.
One bend. One small mark of attention.
The practice, in three movements
Standard. System. Capability.
The work cuts across data standards and domains. The shape of it
does not change.
01
Standard
Mapping public-interest data to the standard that fits it.
Procurement to OCDS or OC4IDS. Extractives to EITI.
Ownership to BODS. Whatever the domain, the work is the same:
make the data comparable, publishable, and verifiable against
a public definition.
Field-level mapping and gap analysis
Cross-standard migration and harmonisation
Validation, quality assurance, and review
Working with the schema, not around it
Deepest OC4IDS field-level mapping reviews across CoST member countries
02
System
The publication and oversight layer that turns a standard into a
working public asset. Data model, API, validation routines,
dashboards, anomaly signals. The system is what makes the
standard usable; a portal is just one of its surfaces.
Publication layer, API, validation
Oversight dashboards and red-flag logic
Freshness, quality, and integrity signals
Recovery roadmap for stalled systems
Reference Kaduna State, Nigeria · 1,496 infrastructure projects published with cost, timeline and completion data
03
Capability
A standard and a system only survive when the institution can
run them. Capability work transfers the practice into the team
- their data, their workflows, their decisions, their
muscle. I leave the institution stronger, not more dependent.
Implementation training for government teams
Using disclosure data for oversight
Data-quality routines and publication governance
Hands-on clinics with the institution’s records
Reference Uganda, Ghana, Malawi, South Sudan · in-country clinics with government teams
Disclosure without verification is performance.
Data without accountability is noise.
Same count. One verified.
Receipts
Where the practice has run.
Seven engagements across twelve years. The bars overlap because the work overlaps — the practice has rarely been one country at a time.
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Standardfield-level mapping
Systemworking portal
Capabilitytransferred to team
Activestill running
Years are engagement spans, not contract dates. Bars marked “present” are still active.
If you are working on this, I am happy to compare notes